Journalism and Social Analysis: Evolution, Effects and Trends (PASEET)

Last update: 27/09/2013

Aumentar Tamaño del texto Disminuir Tamaño del texto

The Carlos III University of Madrid (UC3M) team carries out systematic analysis about trends in the treatment of the information in the Spanish media. It analyses both the trends of the contents and the organizational structures of the journalist editorial offices, the treatment of the information, the configuration of the media agendas (in this case, the agendas are looked at mainly in relation to, and jointly with, the public, civil and political sphere), access to sources, etc. All of this, without prejudice to other complementing areas of research such as new genres and styles, formats, designs, profile of the journalist, and finally the education of digital journalism ... (+)

Digital journalism in times of crisis

Digital journalism in times of crisis

A case study: the treatment of immigration in the media

Coordinated by Maria Pilar Diezhandino, head of research group Paseet, social journalism at the Universidad Carlos III, published by Fundación Telefónica.




Can we still speak about the profession of journalism? Job or profession, does it still have a raison d'être? Is it about a change, or a mere renovation and update of its tasks? If so, which are the professional profiles that the net, the digital environment, the time of global information and broadcasting at a planetary scale, are now requiring? Has the higher profile of social networks, and the inevitable change of personal, professional and social behaviours that it has brought about, substituted the public space that the media once represented?  Has the world of the Internet, paraphrasing Habermas, replaced the world of life? From real to virtual?
Has anyone in the enterprise world questioned the consequences of having converted the journalist into a mere supplier of contents?

These are all questions to which there are not yet answers.

In this report we attempt to find some possible answers, analyse and assess them, and provide arguments. We do this without prejudice to the fact that time may well come upon us to substantiate or on the contrary prove wrong the reasons today given. 

To do so, we have undertaken four Focus Group and some twenty in depth interviews with professionals of long standing journalistic experience. We have also carried out a survey with 133 professionals in charge of digital editions, with or without a link to any other type of traditional platform. Most of these are young professionals without any experience in the traditional media. We have obtained a response rate of 45,1%.

M. Pilar Diezhandino

  • Internet Journalism
  • Journalism and immigration